Decision-Making Process

At KIKKR, we maintain a rigorous and transparent editorial process to ensure that regional innovations and scholarly contributions meet global standards of excellence.

1. Initial Submission Screening

• Technical Check: Screening for regional relevance, formatting, and a 15% similarity threshold via Turnitin.

• Scope Review: The Editor-in-Chief determines if the manuscript offers original knowledge regarding regional development, culture, or innovation.

2. Peer Review Process

• Reviewer Assignment: Double-blind review by two or more independent experts familiar with the regional or thematic context.

• Criteria: Originality, methodological rigor, and contribution to the regional knowledge base.

3. Editorial Evaluation and Final Decision

• Synthesis: The handling editor reconciles reviewer feedback. A third reviewer is consulted if evaluations are inconclusive.

• Outcome: Final decision (Accept, Revisions, or Reject) is issued by the Editor-in-Chief.

4. Revisions and Resubmission

• Timelines: 2–3 weeks for minor adjustments; 4–6 weeks for substantial revisions.

5. Communication and Appeals

• Appeals: Formal written appeals must include a detailed justification and are reviewed by an independent panel.