Editorial Process

At EGRQ, we prioritize systemic rigor and practical impact throughout our editorial evaluation.

1. Manuscript Submission Authors submit via the EGRQ portal, ensuring compliance with institutional and educational reform guidelines.

2. Initial Screening and Plagiarism Check Preliminary screening ensures the manuscript fits the scope of educational management and has a similarity index <15%.

3. Assignment to Section Editor An editor evaluates the work for methodological robustness and its potential to inform educational policy.

4. Double-Blind Peer Review Two independent experts review the manuscript for research design, data integrity, and relevance to systemic reform.

5. Reviewer Recommendations Reviewers suggest: Accept, Minor/Major Revisions, or Reject.

6. Editorial Decision The final decision is communicated to the authors along with anonymized feedback for development.

7. Author Revisions Authors revise the manuscript to meet the high standards of educational governance scholarship.

8. Final Acceptance A formal acceptance letter is issued once all editorial and peer review requirements are met.

9. Copyediting and Proofreading The paper is edited for professional clarity and adherence to EGRQ formatting standards.

10. Online Publication Finalized articles are published online, providing open access to educational leaders and researchers.

11. Post-Publication Dissemination EGRQ shares research through academic indexing, social media, and educational networks.