Decision-Making Process

EGRQ follows a rigorous evaluation process to ensure that manuscripts on systemic educational reform meet the highest scholarly standards.

1. Initial Submission Screening

• Screening: Focus on formatting, reform-centric scope, and a 15% similarity threshold.

• Ethical Check: Ensuring research involving educational institutions has documented clearances.

2. Peer Review Process

• Assignment: Double-blind review by independent experts in educational management and systemic policy.

• Criteria: Methodological robustness, data collection clarity, and potential for systemic impact.

3. Editorial Evaluation and Final Decision

• Consolidation: Handling editors reconcile comments to provide developmental feedback for reform-based research.

4. Revisions and Resubmission

• Timelines: 2–3 weeks for minor policy adjustments; 4–6 weeks for major theoretical revisions.

5. Communication and Appeals

• Decision: All decisions are communicated via a formal letter with detailed feedback.