Peer Review Policy

ECRL safeguards technical excellence through a structured review process designed to promote impartiality and academic rigor.

1. Review Model Each manuscript is scrutinized by 4 Experts (2 Internal and 2 External) in the relevant field of engineering or computing. This double-blind approach eliminates institutional or personal bias.

2. Review Criteria Reviewers evaluate submissions based on:

• Technical accuracy and methodological rigor.

• Innovation and contribution to the field.

• Clarity of writing and data visualization.

3. Timeline and Decisions The average process takes 4–6 weeks. Authors receive detailed reviewer comments and a clear decision letter from the editorial team.

4. Reviewer Recognition ECRL publishes an annual list of reviewers and provides certificates of recognition to honor their essential contributions.