Decision-Making Process

ECRL prioritizes technical accuracy and rapid dissemination through a structured evaluation of all engineering and computing manuscripts.

1. Initial Submission Screening

• Check: Formatting, technical diagrams, and Turnitin index (<15% similarity).

• Scope: The Section Editor verifies relevance to current engineering and computing challenges.

2. Peer Review Process

• Assignment: Double-blind review by technical experts in the relevant sub-discipline.

• Criteria: Technical depth, innovation, replicability, and ethical citation practices.

3. Editorial Evaluation and Final Decision

• Synthesis: The editor reviews the technical consensus to issue an informed final decision.

4. Revisions and Resubmission

• Rigor: Technical revisions may undergo a second round of review to verify software or mathematical results.

5. Appeals: Technical appeals are reviewed by a specialized member of the board.

6. Post-Acceptance: Professional proofreading ensures mathematical and technical accuracy before final release.

7. Ethical Oversight: Commitment to data integrity and the transparent reporting of experimental results.