Reviewer Management
Reviewer Management Policy AEPR maintains a rigorous and transparent reviewer management system to ensure that all applied economic research is evaluated fairly and constructively by qualified econometricians and policy experts.
1. Reviewer Recruitment and Selection
-
Subject Expertise: Reviewers are chosen based on their record in Macroeconomics, Labor Economics, and Fiscal Policy, as well as their proficiency in quantitative methodologies.
-
Selection: Selection considers the reviewer's publication record in high-impact economic journals and their familiarity with current policy discourse.
2. Reviewer Assignment Process
-
Double-Blind Review: This framework ensures that econometric models and policy arguments are prioritized over author reputation.
-
Mentorship: AEPR provides guidance to early-career economists to support the development of high-quality peer review skills.
3. Reviewer Expectations and Guidelines
-
Criteria: Focus on the appropriateness of economic analysis, theoretical clarity, and the empirical validity of policy recommendations.
-
Ethical Responsibility: Reviewers must notify the editor if they identify suspected data manipulation or significant errors in statistical reporting.
4. Communication and Support
-
Editorial Support: The office provides technical assistance for reviewers accessing data files or specialized economic reporting tools.
-
Recognition: AEPR acknowledges contributions through annual reviewer lists and offers certificates of recognition upon request.
5. Managing Conflicts and Misconduct
-
Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must declare any financial or institutional relationships that could influence the review process.
-
Misconduct: Confirmed violations, such as breach of confidentiality or unprofessional feedback, result in immediate removal from the panel.
