Author Appeals Policy

At URSDJ, we prioritize academic fairness in the study of spatial and social transformations. This policy provides a formal pathway for authors to contest decisions they believe were reached through error or bias.

1. Valid Grounds for Appeal

• Misinterpretation: The decision was based on a misunderstanding of the urban/rural data or the social dynamics presented.

• Factual Inaccuracy: Reviewer feedback contained demonstrable factual errors regarding regional planning or sociological frameworks.

• Procedural Error: Evidence of reviewer bias or a failure to follow the double-blind protocol.

2. Submitting an Appeal

• Timeframe: Within 20 calendar days of notification.

• Format: A formal written appeal to the Editor-in-Chief, citing specific reviewer comments and providing supporting evidence or corrected data.

3. Review and Resolution

• The Editor-in-Chief assesses the appeal and may consult a neutral board member or an independent expert in spatial dynamics.

• Outcomes: Uphold the original rejection, invite a revised resubmission, or accept the manuscript.

4. Finality: Only one appeal per manuscript is permitted. The decision of the appeals review is final.