Author Appeals Policy

At HEISJ, we prioritize technical accuracy and fairness. We provide a structured process for authors to appeal decisions that may stem from technical misinterpretations or procedural errors.

1. Grounds for Appeal

  • Misinterpretation of algorithmic logic, data processing, or intelligent system methodology.

  • Factual errors in reviewer feedback regarding technical benchmarks or software applications.

  • Evidence of reviewer bias or conflict of interest in the tech-academic domain.

2. Submission

  • Timeframe: Within 20 calendar days of notification.

  • Format: Formal letter to the Editor-in-Chief with a clear technical justification.

3. Review Process

  • Initial assessment by the Editor-in-Chief.

  • If complex technical claims are made, a neutral board member with relevant technical expertise will be consulted.

4. Ethical Oversight: Any claims of technical sabotage or intellectual property bias are referred to the Ethics Committee.